Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Well-Appreciated but (Too) Difficult Pensions Choices? Insights from the Swedish Premium Pension System

By Monika Böhnke (Maastricht University – Department of Marketing), Elisabeth Brüggen (Maastricht University) & Thomas Post (Maastricht University – School of Business and Economics – Department of Finance; Netspar)

We analyze experiences of savers in a DC pension scheme from Sweden – a country that was among the first to launch choice-based funded individual pension accounts. Based on a survey among 2,646 savers, we find that the average saver feels unknowledgeable about the scheme and experiences choice overload. Pension savers with a high degree of choice overload are likely to be influenced in their investment decisions by peers and advisors. Low knowledgeable and risk-averse savers tend to invest in the default fund – a fund that is, however, one of the most risky funds. On top of this mismatch between savers’ risk-aversion and investment choices we also find that risk-averse savers and savers with low subjective knowledge are more likely to feel pessimistic about their future financial well-being. Those who appreciate choice in pensions are more optimistic. However, the actual act of choosing has barely an effect on the perception of financial well-being. Interestingly, most pension savers do not tend to remember the funds they chose, but rather the fund provider, which they paradoxically consider as the least important decision criterion to make a fund choice. Based on our results we derive suggestions for reforming choice-based pension schemes.

Source: SSRN