Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

US. The crisis of multiemployer pension plans: Where do we go from here?

It is no secret that many multiemployer pension plans are struggling – paying out substantially more in benefits to retirees than the income they are receiving. Without legislative action, many are expected to go bankrupt in the next 5 to 15 years, leaving current retirees and active employees without the retirement income they expected. To understand where we go from here, let’s first explore the history of multiemployer plans, then look at potential avenues for reform.

How did we get here?

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 created new fiduciary standards for trustees of multiemployer benefit plans and regulated the vesting and funding of benefits. ERISA also guaranteed certain participant benefits not funded by plan assets upon the termination of a plan.

Furthermore, under ERISA, employers that contributed to multiemployer funds had only limited liability for unfunded benefits. If a fund could not recover assets from employers, the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation would step in and finance the payments from annual premiums paid by plans.

Only four years later, it became obvious that those steps would not be sufficient to maintain a viable pension system. Accordingly, in 1980, Congress passed the Multiemployer Pension Protection Amendments Act. The MPPAA limited the circumstances under which the PBGC would step in and pay guaranteed benefits and raised the premium rate to generate revenues. Additionally, the MPPAA instituted the possibility of withdrawal liability if (assuming certain circumstances were met), an employer ceased making or substantially reduced its contributions to a multiemployer benefit plan.

Read more @Benefits Pro