Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

UK pensions tax relief review deemed ‘unnecessary’

The UK’s Public Accounts Committee (Pac) and National Audit Office (NAO) have taken aim at the government, claiming that HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) “does not understand the impact of the largest tax reliefs”.

Responding to the Pac report on the management of tax reliefs, the government said that a review into the impact of pensions tax relief is not needed, as it has already been assesed through other consultations.

These include looking at the administration of pensions tax relief, transitional agreement changes and variations to income thresholds for the tapered annual allowance.

The government said: “These investigations included gathering views and evidence from stakeholders to understand the regime’s impacts and the impacts of possible changes.

“The evidence provided directly influenced policy development. For example, responses to the 2015 wide-ranging consultation on pensions tax relief indicated there was no clear consensus for reform at that time; and so, at budget 2016, the then-government announced it would not make fundamental reform to pensions tax reliefs at that stage.

“The government will continue to engage with stakeholders to understand the regime’s impacts and gather evidence through consultations such as those listed above but does not think it is the right time now for a formal evaluation.”

Read more @International Adviser