Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Sustainability of pension schemes: Building a smooth automatic balance mechanism with an application to the us social security

By Frédéric GannonFlorence Legros & Vincent Touzé

We build a “smooth” automatic balancing mecanism (S-ABM) which would result from an optimal tradeoff between increasing the receipts and reducing the expenditures of a pension scheme. The S-ABM obtains from minimizing a sum of discounted quadratic loss function under the constraint of an intertemporal budget balance. One advantage of this model of “optimal” adjustment is its ability to analyse various configurations in terms of ABMs by controlling the adjustment pace. Notably, this S-ABM permits to specify two particular cases we respectively denote “flat Swedish-type ABM” and “fiscal-cliff US-type ABM”. They are obtained by assuming very high adjustment costs on revenue (implying only pension benefit adjustment) and by choosing specific sequences of social time preference rate. We apply this ABM to the case of the United States Social Security to evaluate the potential adjustments necessary to ensure financial sustainability. These assessments are made under various assumptions about forecast time horizon, social time preference and weighting of social costs associated with increased receipts and/or lower expenditures.

Source @CAIRN