Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Retirement Plan Reforms in the Absence of a Retirement Policy

By Natalya Shnitser

The US retirement system is currently characterized by tremendous diversity of instruments, institutions, and intermediaries in pursuit of the same goal. While the goal – achieving financial security in retirement – is widely accepted by policymakers and participants, for individuals in the United States, the nature of the “investment” experience in the retirement context varies considerably based on the identity, savviness, and size of the intermediaries, as well as the particular legal regime to which such intermediaries are subject.

This chapter traces the evolution of retirement saving in the United States and catalogues the multitude of intermediaries that currently channel workers’ money into retirement savings programs. It shows that while retirement savings in the United States remain largely tethered to employment – with individual employers still serving as critical intermediaries – the last decade has witnessed the rise of retirement plans that limit the role of employers. Such new arrangements include retirement plans sponsored by professional employer organizations, pooled plan providers, and state and local governments. Furthermore, in a significant departure from the status quo, newer legal regimes for retirement savings have also moved away from the traditional employer-as-fiduciary regulatory model by both shifting retirement plan responsibilities to third parties and by relying increasingly on rules rather than standards to regulate the conduct of retirement plan intermediaries. The experience of participants in such plans is likely to shape retirement policy in the coming years.

Source @SSRN