Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Pensions and living with your kids

By Markus Goldstein

When a government implements a policy, there is often a question about how it will interact and/or displace existing informal practices. For example, awhile back there was a lot of discussion around how government provided insurance would displace (or not) informal risk sharing arrangements that may have been doing a good job of protecting some people from risk.

But it’s hard to address this kind of question deeply in a randomized control trial. A lot of the informal arrangements may be grounded in customary practices that are spread across a wide geographic area and they could move in a general equilibrium sense that the average RCT would miss. Into this gap comes an interesting new paper by Natalie Bau.

Bau is looking at the introductions of formal pensions in developing countries. And she finds that they shift behavior in some surprising ways – changing how parents treat their kids that they might expect to provide support for them in their dotage. She does this in a neat way, utilizing variation in customary practices in Indonesia and Ghana as well as census data and administrative information on the roll-out of pensions. Let’s take a look at some of her findings (and a bit on how she gets there).

Source: The World Bank