Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Liquidity crunch tops institutional investors’ greatest tail risks

The top three tail risks for global institutional asset owners are an unexpected liquidity crunch, a military conflict in the Asia-Pacific region and a major cyberattack, according to a new survey conducted by PGIM, the money management subsidiary of Prudential Financial.

The survey of 400 senior investment officials at asset owners representing more than $12 trillion in assets shows the greatest common level of concern is a liquidity crunch in capital markets resulting in a market crash, according to a report of survey results on PGIM’s website. Those are followed by a military conflict in the Taiwan Strait or South China Sea, and a lengthy cyberattack disabling a major financial platform or government agency.

PGIM’s Hyat: Largest firms will continue to pull away from pack

For the survey, respondents evaluated 19 possible tails risks according to likelihood, severity and preparedness. It was conducted in June and July by CoreData Research among senior investment officials at institutional asset owners in the U.S., U.K., Germany, Australia, China and Japan.

“Too often investors are surprised by things that in retrospect were staring them in the face,” said Shehriyar Antia, head of thematic research for PGIM, in a news release Thursday announcing the release of the survey report. “The pandemic, the global financial crisis, the dot-com bubble — these events were all foreseeable to different degrees. Financial institutions must either gameplan for the unexpected, or expect to be blindsided.”

According to the survey report, 41% of respondents say a primary tail-risk monitoring challenge is the inability to act quickly when risks are identified. Multiple answers were accepted and the next-highest responses were 36% each saying they feared failure to detect early warning signs of risks, and the failure to predict the materialization of unknown risks, or “black swans.”

By region, U.S.-based respondents gave more weight to economic and inflation-related risks, specifically expressing the greatest level of concern that the 10-year Treasury yield will reach double digits. For U.K.-based respondents, the greatest level of concern was a eurozone economy defaulting on its debt; in Japan, a global economic slowdown forcing central banks to bring interest rates back to zero; in Germany, the China real estate bubble popping and creating a global recession; in China, another global pandemic; and in Australia, the U.S. and China banning bilateral trade.

Read more @Pensions&Investments

179 views