Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Intergenerational inequality and pension systems

By CAndreas Charalambous and Omiros Pissarides

he issue of income inequality lies at the heart of political discussions, both at EU and worldwide levels. Inequality manifests itself in different forms – inequality within a country, inequality between countries and intergenerational inequality.

Today’s article deals with the issue of intergenerational inequality, aiming at safeguarding a satisfactory quality of life for future generations, with a particular emphasis on vulnerable citizens. The main policy instrument for this purpose is the adaptation of pension systems.

Modern pension systems are based on three pillars – state social pensions, occupational pensions and private arrangements, with the latter often linked to insurances. It is generally acknowledged that the current framework neither safeguards the long-term adequacy for individuals nor the financial viability of the pension systems.

The state social pension, financed via tripartite contributions and partly via government budgets, is expected to remain the main pillar in the future. However, the likely prolonged low interest rate environment, in conjunction with population aging, will unavoidably necessitate beneficiary contribution rate increases, as well as increases in budgetary support with a view to safeguarding adequate pensions for all, including the less fortunate social classes. Contribution increases should remain within affordable boundaries, thus avoiding an undue burden on labour costs and household disposable incomes. Increases will also be required in terms of state contribution in order to ensure socially acceptable minimum pensions for the unemployed and the low paid. Evidently, although this goal is a key social priority, margins are not unlimited.

Read more @Cyprus

646 views